Imran Khan - The Revolutionist

Thursday, May 17, 2012

I deserve an apology, says Shah Rukh Khan - geo.tv

New 0 0 Email0

MUMBAI: Bollywood star Shah Rukh Khan Thursday denied all the reports claiming that he was drunk and misbehaved with officials at the Wankhede stadium, saying that he deserved an apology.
"I won't deny that I could have said something in a fit of anger, but I will not apologise," said Shah Rukh Khan Thursday, adding that the security officials from the Mumbai Cricket Association (MCA) manhandled children and that they should say sorry for their rudeness.
"I don't think that my behaviour was incorrect or I did something illegal. I think what I did was correct. They are my kids and I have a responsibility towards them. I will not apologise. They (officials) should apologise to me," Shah Rukh told reporters here.
Co-owner of Kolkata Knight Riders (KKR), the Bollywood superstar's statement came Thursday as he faced a lifetime ban on entering the Wankhede Stadium after he allegedly turned up drunk at the ground and misbehaved with security guards and cricket officials.
The incident took place Wednesday night after his Kolkata Knight Riders beat Mumbai Indians in the Indian Premier League match at the stadium.
The 46-year-old allegedly misbehaved and pushed the security guard at the stadium, following which he also abused officials from the MCA when they tried to intervene late Wednesday night.
"I had gone to pick up my children who were there to watch the match. I went there, congratulated my team and when I came back, I saw that there a gentleman was manhandling the children. They were pushing little girls. I just told him that this is not the way to behave," said Shah Rukh. (Monitoring Desk)

Hamid Mir -Muzammil Baba Kab Tak Rota Rahega

Jang Multimedia

Revolution, bloody revolution!

The writer is a correspondent with The New York Times and is based in Islamabad. The views expressed in the article are his own

Hasan Nisar, the columnist who ordinarily wears expensive watches and clothes and passionately and angrily talks about the plight of the poor, is a popular talk show guest. I like the man for his irreverent tone towards the corrupt political elite and decadent religious figureheads. But for all his apparent rationality and usually progressive views, he sometimes surprises his readers and audience.

In his weekend talk show appearance, Nisar urged sending hundreds of thousands of people to the guillotine. “We need ten thousand Tara Masihs”, he said, referring to the executioner of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. Mr Nisar amended the reference to Masih, clarifying that it was only a figurative reference to the Masih that executed an innocent man but that executioners were needed to sort out the mess in the country. Nothing new here, some would say.

Such a wish for a bloody revolution is expressed often and seen as a quick remedy for the ills that have racked this ‘Land of the Pure’. The guillotines of the French Revolution are admired here, both by cracker-barrel philosophers and armchair analysts, as if they provide the only cure to the malaise that has gnawed this country. Colonel Imam (the nom de guerre of Sultan Amir Tarar), the intelligence operative who was often referred to as the godfather of the Taliban, expressed similar views in 2010, not long before he was kidnapped and eventually killed by the Taliban. I had invited Colonel Imam to my house for an interview. He was a tall man who liked to say that he understood a question even before it was completed. He narrated several tales from his experiences with the Afghans; his idolisation of Mullah Omar and how the Taliban took over Afghanistan. Before leaving, Imam raised his finger and made a prediction: “I tell you there will be a bloody revolution in Pakistan.” He predicted a grim picture where the ordinary population would pick up arms and take revenge from the ruling elite. It was the only inevitability, he warned.

I shuddered at such bloody predictions back then and was uncomfortable with Nisar’s guillotine idea. But actually, there is no dearth of those who hear the clarion of revolution and include some unlikely figures like Abdul Sattar Edhi, the philanthropist. And then there are some who say that the next military coup — if and whenever it happens — will not be a ‘bloodless coup’, as has been the case in the past.

A bloody revolution is romanticised as some essential purifying process which would ensure that rotten people are eliminated, leaving only those citizens who are pure or who want and represent change. In some ways, such wishes for blood and gore are rooted in the absolute grievances towards a political and social system that has failed to deliver. Nothing works, especially for the poor and downtrodden. So, the prevalent common wisdom is that the old order must be destroyed first in order to pave way for a new one.

But how does this ensure that those who are clamoring for blood will not become victims of this bloodshed themselves? How can annihilation and destruction be selective in its targets and predictable in its course? And how readily and easily will the subsequent chaos and mayhem give way to order and peace? Such questions are eclipsed by the fantasies of those who want a bloody revolution. It offers a quick fix and patience for an evolutionary, gradual process towards change that is running thin. Hasan Nisar is at his best when he comments on society and tears apart its inherent hypocrisy and contradictions. I hope in his next talk show episode, he can explain why he thinks the guillotine is the only way forward.

Published in The Express Tribune, May 17^th, 2012.

Babar Awan indicted by SC

Islamabad: Ex-Minister for Law and Justice Babar Awan has been indicted by the Supreme Court of Pakistan for contempt of court.

However, Babar Awan has refused to accept the indictment and pleads his innocence.

He also said that there is no law regarding contempt of court in Pakistan.

Babar Awan also said, “Attorney General hasn’t been heard ever since the proceedings of the court began.”

He has been accused of contempt of court after he lashed out at the Supreme Court and the PML-N in a press conference.

He responded that his press conference was of political nature and the target of the press conference was PML-N. He further said that he had no intention of ridiculing the SC.

Babar Awan is already under the cosh after being stripped off all his ranks from the Pakistan’s Peoples’ Party

Sunday, May 13, 2012

The PTI argument - The Best Piece I've Ever Read

The PTI argument

Adiah Afraz

My interest in the PTI is academic in nature. Well sort of. Actually as a PTI supporting columnist I often find myself in a strange position of being answerable for many PTI actions.
“Your Imran Khan has sent a letter to a JD rally?” I would be accused.
“Your Imran Khan has refused to share roof with Salman Rushdie in India” I would be smirked at.
“Your Imran Khan is calling us liberal scum...” long whine.
From Jamat-ud-Dawa to Sita White, and the philosophy of hair colour to the possibility of Botox, I am increasingly held accountable for a variety of things Imran Khan does or says. And frankly, being a layman of sorts especially when it comes to making polite conversation in the social sciences jargon, it is not always easy to avert the IK hating onslaught from the intellectual dragons.
I either make an emotional argument about Imran Khan’s honesty and philanthropy, or rephrase his theory of ‘engage the marginalised’, or simply just maintain a stubborn mulish stance that Imran Khan is good for Pakistan simply because he is. Period.
Thus begins a regimen of watching re-runs of Imran Khan interviews, tediously going through print sources, and randomly going to PTI events, quietly sitting in dark corners, and taking notes.
In order to inform, I need to stay informed.
Now no matter how much I want to make use of my notes from the PTI gatherings and write a ground breaking piece about how the PTI is a party of the liberal, by the liberal for the liberal; yet this one is not about the PTI as much as it is about my genuine inability to understand why there is so much scepticism about Imran Khan among certain intellectuals despite his spotless credentials.
The argument against Khan has three categories. The basic argument, the before and after argument, and the more ridiculous argument.
(And remember, I am not making this up. This is a summary of real arguments raised by real people possessing real credentials.)
Basic argument: Politics in Pakistan is not what a layman thinks it is. And by layman we mean all the aunties and fools that form the PTI. Or was it the maulvies and fools that formed the PTI? Well same thing.
So politics in Pakistan is not about honesty and massive rallies. It’s about something else. We won’t tell you what. For that you will have to get a degree in politics. For now just rest assured that if you like Imran Khan, then you are either naïve and ill-read or an aunty and a fool.
Imran Khan might be honest but so were most of the fascist dictators. He might be popular but so was Hitler. Nationalism of every kind leads to fascism eventually. Hence it is concluded that a corrupt government of a corrupt party that we have tried numerous times is better than an honest person with popular support because we haven’t tried him right? So we never know what he will do if tried. After all army is bad for democracy and it’s the army that is supporting Imran Khan.
And no we don’t believe in conspiracy theories, we just listen to the underground mole grapevine theories. Amen.
The before and after (the Tsunami) arguments.
Before: Why is the PTI a one-man party? How can Imran Khan win if he doesn’t make alliances?
After: Why is Imran Khan letting everyone join his party? He is going to be lost among a crowd of ‘leaders’. He will be the proverbial camel out of the tent.
Before: Does Imran Khan think that taking out measly rallies against missing persons is going to help? After: Why doesn’t Imran Khan go to the missing person’s camp? Why has he ditched the missing persons?
Before: The PTI is a party of housewives bored out of their skulls trying to avert a middle age crisis. After: Why are there no women on stage in the PTI rallies? Tsk, the PTI has lopsided gender representation.
Before: Why doesn’t PTI talk about minority rights? After: Hey, IK is talking about minority rights. AND he is praying on the stage. Conclusion: IK is a point scoring mullah.
Before: IK has no support in the streets. After: IK is just a one Tsunami wonder. Well, two Tsunami wonder may be, big deal. Actually Tsunami is not even a positive term. IK should stop using it.
Before: Ha, ha the tsunami has fizzled out. See we told you. Now why is IK reluctant to hold a tsunami in Quetta? After: Ok, he did, did he? But we are not commenting on it because we are busy somewhere else.
My list is long. But I am running out of word limit so let me move to the third category.
The Ridiculous Argument: All Imran Khan ever does is to talk about Shaukat Khanum. A country is not a cancer hospital.
Well, a country my dear friends, is not a Swiss account either. Neither is it a place of plunder for the rich and the corrupt.
My argument is simple.
Do we know of any Pakistani institution, which is made by Pakistanis, is run by Pakistanis, is self-sustaining, is corruption free, nepotism free, has no VIP culture, has international prestige and meets global high quality standards?
My suggestion is, go and visit the hospital. Take a round and then stop by the mosque. Because it’s there that you will witness one thing that distinguishes Imran Khan from the entire breed of politicians.
People pray for Imran Khan.
Hearts that are hurting and humbled, helpless and hoping for a miracle, pray for Imran Khan.
Call me outdated, call me provincial, dig out all sorts of technicalities and build all sorts of arguments, but I would still like to believe in this person.
At least he won’t ask us to leave the country if ever we got sick of him. If you don’t know what I mean watch Gilani’s interview to CNN.
Hey I have a question: Why is nobody criticising him?

‘Main Hun Shahid Afridi’ – Pakistan’s very own cricket-based film

Cricket and cinema are two of the favourite pastimes of people in the subcontinent, and the success of films like ‘Lagaan’ proves that. The trend is being replicated in Paksitan too-last year, Pakistan-born and UK-based filmmaker Faisal Aman Khan made a film on the life of cricketer Imran Khan. And now, it's Pakistan's former cricket skipper Shahid Afridi whose name - and possibly his cameo - will be part of a Pakistani film on cricket.
The film, ‘Main Hun Shahid Afridi’, is being produced by Humayun Saeed and Shazad Nasib, and is, of course, based on cricket. Pakistani actor-turned-producer Humayun said, “It's for the first time in the history of Pakistani films that that a sports movie will be directed, produced and shot here.” But why is the movie titled ‘Main Hun Shahid Afridi’? Says Humayun, "Today, every young boy in Pakistan wants to become Shahid Afridi. The story of the film basically revolves around the life of a young boy and his struggle to become a cricketer. The story is very simple but the message is that people who want to enter sports, should concentrate more on their passion for the game rather than get into scandals and controversies." Humayun elaborates, "Almost 50 percent of the shooting of the movie is done. We have shot the movie at some popular stadiums in Sialkot, Islamabad and Karachi. The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) has provided us the proper facilities and coaches to train the cast for the movie.” The movie is being directed by Osama Ali Raza and has been written by Wasay Chaudhary. "The lead is being played by a 19-year-old Noman Habib who is a talented actor and also a professional cricketer. I shall also be part of the movie and will be playing the role of a coach," adds Humayun. Is Afridi acting in the movie? Says Humayun: “We had approached Shahid to act in it, but he refused to do it, mainly due to family pressure and religious reasons. However, we hope to convince him to make a special appearance in the movie.” Are there any plans to rope in international cricketers for the film? Says Humayun, "Why not? I have spoken to Shahid and he has shown some interest in taking the conversation forward to some of his cricketer friends like Sachin Tendulkar and Sangakkara.” Humayun also says that the film will feature the T20 format, which will be introduced in Pakistan soon in the form of the Pakistan Premier League. Rahat Fateh Ali Khan and Shafqat Amanat Ali have been roped in for two songs in the movie. "We want to take the movie to the global audience," says Humayun.